DONTREFI

The placement problem, honestly

A retail borrower faces one lender's guidelines. A single-lender shop can only say yes or no. A broker with an automated matrix can say which lender — and say it today.

What everyone else is fast at

The automated equity shops are genuinely excellent at one thing: clean files. W-2 income, individual title, strong credit, tidy CLTV — those close in about five days and nobody, including us, beats that. If that's your file, use them.

What nobody is fast at

Nobody is fast on messy files — not because messy underwriting is hard, but because the triage is manual. The traditional version is a broker emailing account executives one at a time: "would you take an irrevocable trust in California at 62%?" — and a week later the answer is three maybes and a no.

We automated exactly that week. The desk holds the published guidelines of 11 wholesale lenders — 23 second-lien and equity programs — as structured data: states, occupancy, title vesting, documentation paths, credit floors, leverage caps, line sizes. Your nine answers run every gate at once.

What the memo refuses to do

The part nobody else shows

Every memo includes the declines: which programs are out, and the specific gate each one failed — the state, the vesting, the cap, the minimum. That section costs us nothing to show and it is the reason a second file comes back. We even track the lenders that publish no second-lien product at all (4 confirmed so far), so a "nobody does this" answer is a checked fact, not a shrug.

Then a human reads it

The desk is triage, not judgment. A licensed broker reviews every scenario before anything is submitted anywhere, calls the AE where the matrix says "verify," and owns the file to closing. The machine buys back the week; the human spends it on your deal instead of on email.